<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>TheJunction.net &#187; Sun Microsystems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thejunction.net/tag/sun-microsystems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thejunction.net</link>
	<description>where it all comes together...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:41:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft, IBM Caught with Pants Down Over Sun-Oracle Deal</title>
		<link>http://thejunction.net/2009/04/20/microsoft-ibm-caught-with-pants-down-over-sun-oracle-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://thejunction.net/2009/04/20/microsoft-ibm-caught-with-pants-down-over-sun-oracle-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Ellison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejunction.net/?p=2368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="aligncenter" src="http://thejunction.net/blog-images/PantsDown2x.jpg" alt="Pants down" width="544" height="379" /> <br /> When asked what he thought of the Sun purchase by Oracle - "I need to think about it," Ballmer told reporters in Moscow, "I am very surprised." I'm hearing that Ballmer wasn't the only one surprised by Monday's deal. According to a source of mine, IBM hadn't given up on purchasing Sun and was blindsided by Oracle's move. [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thejunction.net/2009/04/20/microsoft-ibm-caught-with-pants-down-over-sun-oracle-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Sun a Suitable Marriage Partner For IBM?</title>
		<link>http://thejunction.net/2009/03/23/is-sun-suitable-marriage-partner-for-ibm/</link>
		<comments>http://thejunction.net/2009/03/23/is-sun-suitable-marriage-partner-for-ibm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejunction.net/?p=1643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overlapping products and vastly different cultures will present challenges. But if they make it stick, the results could be great for both sides. [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thejunction.net/2009/03/23/is-sun-suitable-marriage-partner-for-ibm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

